ERIC PICKLES MP
SHADOW SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES & LOCAL GOVERNMENT
HOUSE OF COMMONS
LONDON SW1A 0AA
27 June 2008
Dear Councillor Smith,
GOVERNMENT PLANS FOR BIN TAXES & THE 2009 ELECTIONS
I wanted to provide you with an update on the Labour Government’s plans to levy new bin taxes on family homes. Despite repeated briefings by Downing Street that Gordon Brown is scared that bin taxes will be unpopular, the Government is moving ahead with legislation to introduce new charges for the collection of household rubbish.
Initially, five pilot schemes will adopt these new taxes; the Government’s own predictions then forecast that the taxes will be extended to two out of three homes. Ministers have written this week to every local authority chief executive, to try to invite councils to take part in such schemes. This is a trap to attempt to entice Conservatives councils into supporting the Government’s deeply unpopular plans. I believe that every Conservative councillor has a key role to play in defending families from these taxes.
The key arguments against participating in such pilots are as follows:
· Higher taxes on families: Families across the country are suffering from a soaring cost of living. Bin taxes will punish families for having children. Even the Government’s own optimistic Impact Assessment admits that families will pay £72.31 a year more. The Treasury has openly admitted the new ‘waste incentives’ are officially a tax.
· Increasing the tax burden: Labour Ministers claim that such schemes could be revenue neutral. They made the same empty promises about the council tax revaluation in Wales. Representations from councils across the country have warned that the Government’s sums do not add up due to the set-up, administration, collection and enforcement costs of a brand new tax, as well as the need for new lockable bins. As the Chartered Institute of Water and Environmental Management have warned:
“Costs will be incurred to councils for administration and enforcement. This means that in terms of value added such initiatives would therefore do nothing to assist councils manage their waste budget in the face of rising costs. If the costs for administration are expected to increase substantially in order for householders to be monitored and billed accordingly, but with overall council tax remain bill remaining the same, then either householders who are recycling will pay a proportionately larger slice (this may be significant sums per annum, as has occurred in Ireland, where costs of 300-400 Euros are not uncommon for waste collection), or other council services might have to be reduced in order for revenue to be redirected to cover waste administration.”
· Harmful to the environment: Bin taxes will lead to a surge in fly-tipping and backyard burning. Fly-tipping has already soared in the last three years due to higher landfill taxes. Bin taxes will give perverse incentives to households to dump their rubbish, stuff it in bins other than their own, or contaminate recycling collections. In the Republic of Ireland, bin taxes have led to 4 in 10 households now burning their rubbish, and such burning of now causes 73% of all dioxin emissions. Under the Government’s proposals, civil amenity sites will have to remain free for household waste. Many residents will therefore drive to the local dump to avoid bin taxes – increasing carbon emissions and congestion.
· Electorally unpopular: The politics of rubbish is very high on media’s agenda and a great cause of public concern. Councils which introduce bin taxes will be vilified in the popular press and punished at the polls. I am sure that Liberal Democrats will happily be two-faced in opposing them locally, even though they support the taxes in Cowley Street. Nationally, we will not hesitate to criticise any supposedly-Conservative council which collaborates with the Labour Ministers and props up Gordon Brown’s discredited stealth tax regime.
In short, bin taxes will harm the local environment and increase the cost of living. This is just another cynical Labour attempt to tax families more by stealth, but with a thick coat of greenwash. The Government should be working instead with councils to extend recycling collections, and make it easier for all households to go green. There is certainly a role for incentives, but not for taxes or charges.
There is great concern in local government about the growing cost of waste. The Government is imposing massive regulatory costs on local councils through LATS and landfill tax. But the answer is not to increase taxes on families, but for the Government to compensate councils for those costs.
With a significant set of local and European elections in 2009, Conservatives need a unified front in opposing these new taxes. We intend to provide a campaign pack against bin taxes in due course, which will provide you with ammunition to take on our opponents in the run up to the elections. We can take the fight to Labour on an issue which will resonate with every household in the land.
I want every Conservative councillor to show how people can vote blue, go green and keep the cost of living down.
Yours truly,
Eric Pickles MP
Shadow Secretary of State for Communities & Local Governmen
Friday, 27 June 2008
Thursday, 26 June 2008
Boris at least tried
Post office legal bid rejected
The final list of post offices to close in London was published in May
The Mayor of London's legal bid to save 155 post offices in the city has failed at the High Court.
Judges rejected Boris Johnson's application for a judicial review into the closures, forcing the mayor to call on the government to intervene.
The ex-MP has written to ministers calling on them to take "immediate action" on the issue.
The Post Office has said about 90% of Londoners would see no change to their nearest branch under the proposals.
"I am deeply disappointed that the review has not been successful and have written to the Secretary of State, John Hutton to express my feelings," said Mr Johnson.
"I have also called on him to persuade the government, as the only shareholder in the Post Office, to reconsider the current closure programme and take urgent action to save London's post offices."
The final list of post offices to be closed in London was published in May after a six-week public consultation.
The final list of post offices to close in London was published in May
The Mayor of London's legal bid to save 155 post offices in the city has failed at the High Court.
Judges rejected Boris Johnson's application for a judicial review into the closures, forcing the mayor to call on the government to intervene.
The ex-MP has written to ministers calling on them to take "immediate action" on the issue.
The Post Office has said about 90% of Londoners would see no change to their nearest branch under the proposals.
"I am deeply disappointed that the review has not been successful and have written to the Secretary of State, John Hutton to express my feelings," said Mr Johnson.
"I have also called on him to persuade the government, as the only shareholder in the Post Office, to reconsider the current closure programme and take urgent action to save London's post offices."
The final list of post offices to be closed in London was published in May after a six-week public consultation.
Sunday, 22 June 2008
Your Money again
Once again we see the Lib/Dems go back on their word and give more money to the Rose, despite saying that they would not put more money into the Theatre, having put millions of council tax payers money in already, We Conservatives have always been in favour on a Theatre, but not in favour of using our tax money to pay for it.
Road and pavement repair is one area that we are trying to address, but the Lib/Dems cut around £65000 form our budget, and that meant we had to draw up a list of priorities and cut back on others, but will try and use any under spend from last year to address those issues.
New Malden High Street is an ongoing Problem; we are trying to put right the previous administration of MCNC mistakes, and of course we have no control over the utilities, like Water and Gas Electricity, who seems for ever trying to fine a reason for digging it up.
Our support in the St James Ward is continuing to grow, and new members are coming on board, if you would like to join our ever-expanding membership, please let us know and we will send you the information.
It also nice to see our neighbours in Beverly Ward go from strength to strength, im sure we will hear a lot more about their activities, but note they will be running a stall during the New Malden fortnight, so give them your support
Road and pavement repair is one area that we are trying to address, but the Lib/Dems cut around £65000 form our budget, and that meant we had to draw up a list of priorities and cut back on others, but will try and use any under spend from last year to address those issues.
New Malden High Street is an ongoing Problem; we are trying to put right the previous administration of MCNC mistakes, and of course we have no control over the utilities, like Water and Gas Electricity, who seems for ever trying to fine a reason for digging it up.
Our support in the St James Ward is continuing to grow, and new members are coming on board, if you would like to join our ever-expanding membership, please let us know and we will send you the information.
It also nice to see our neighbours in Beverly Ward go from strength to strength, im sure we will hear a lot more about their activities, but note they will be running a stall during the New Malden fortnight, so give them your support
Operation Varsity
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)